Technical writing is often referred to as “writing for the computer”. This may be a good description of the writing process, but that doesn’t mean that it can be a bad thing.
I’ve been in the industry for about 10 years now, and I can tell you that you’re not the only one who has gone through this. I think of it as a process, not a profession. I was hired as a technical writer in 2003 and that was about it. I still had to do an internship at the time of my hiring, but I never had the chance to go back to school to get my degree.
I know a lot of people who have gone into their career as writers, but I would say that most never write for the computer. The reason for this is simple. Writing for computers is a strange, unnatural, and very unnatural combination of the human and the machine. The reason for this is because computers are machines without a human in the loop. Computers are not very much like human beings. So they take all the work out of writing. But computers can do all kinds of things.
So you can write as a programmer, and you can write as a technical writer, or you can do both. A technical writer writes code. A programmer writes code. That’s the only difference. A programmer can write code to do a computer’s job. A technical writer can write code to do a computer’s job. But a programmer is not a person who can write code.
In my case, I like to think of myself as a technical writer. My name is Michael. I’m a technical writer at the University of Houston. I go to the computer lab and I write code. I write code to do computer stuff. I write code to do computer stuff that is as well-written as my academic paper. I write code to do computer stuff that is as well-written as my academic paper.
You can write code to do anything. But you can only do that if you’re not a person who is also a programmer. A person who has expertise in a specific field can also do that. But there’s no such thing as a computer programmer. As a programmer is something else.
A programmer can code, but is not a person who is already a programmer.
In an ideal world, a computer programmer would be someone who has the background and skills to write programs that are sufficiently efficient and reliable that they are required to be used as part of a computer system. But a person who is a software house is not a person who is already a programmer.
I think that some of the best programmers I’ve ever met have been programmers. They’re just not the kind of people who talk about their software in the same way they talk about their lives. But as a programmer, you can talk about your life in ways that are very different from the way you talk about your software.
So if youre a programmer, you can talk about your programming in a way that is very different from the way you talk about your life. And I think that many of the people who are good at programming are also good at talking about their lives and their programming in the same way. But a person who is a programmer is not a person who is already a programmer.